| The goal of anticoagulant
therapy with warfarin is to administer the lowest effective dose
of the drug to maintain the target international normalized ratio
(INR). Warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is an oral anticoagulant
indicated for the prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis
and its extension and the prevention and treatment of the thromboembolic
complications associated with atrial fibrillation. Warfarin has
also been used to prevent recurrent transient ischemic attacks and
to reduce the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction, but data
supporting these indications are inconclusive at this time (1).
Warfarin
inhibits the synthesis of clotting factors II,
VII, IX, and X, as well as the naturally
occurring endogenous anticoagulant proteins C and
S (2). The anticoagulant and antithrombotic
activity of warfarin depends on the clearance of
functional clotting factors from the systemic
circulation once the drug is administered (2, 3).
The earliest changes in INR are typically seen 24
to 36 hours after administration of the dose. The
antithrombotic effect of warfarin is not present
until approximately the fifth day of therapy,
which is dependent on the clearance of
prothrombin (1, 2).
Initiation of warfarin therapy is challenging,
since the pharmacodynamic response is delayed and
difficult to predict. Because prothrombin has a
half-life of around 50 hours, loading doses of
warfarin are of limited value (4). In clinical
practice, loading doses (e.g., 7.5 mg or more per
day) of warfarin may increase the patient's risk
of bleeding complications early in therapy by
eliminating the production of functional factor
VII (2, 5). Administration of loading doses may
place a patient in a hypercoagulable state due to
a severe depletion of protein C (2). The
administration of a loading dose is a possible
source of prolonged hospitalization secondary to
dramatic rises in the INR value that may
necessitate the administration of vitamin K (5).
If a rapid anticoagulant effect is required, an
initial dose of heparin or a low-molecular-weight
heparin should be used and overlapped with
warfarin for approximately 4 to 5 days. Once the
INR is therapeutic for at least 2 days, the
supplemental anticoagulation treatment may be
discontinued (1, 4, 5).
The safety and efficacy of warfarin therapy
are dependent on maintaining the INR within the
target range for the indication (Table 1). When
a patient is started on an oral anticoagulant,
INR monitoring should be performed daily until
the INR is within the therapeutic range for at
least 2 consecutive days. Unexpected fluctuations
in the INR in an otherwise stable patient could
be due to a change in diet, poor compliance,
undisclosed drug use, alcohol consumption, or
self-medication (2). Lab error should also be
considered for unexpected values.
| Table 1. Recommended
therapeutic range for oral anticoagulant
therapy* |
| Indication
|
INR |
| Treatment of venous
thrombosis |
2.0-3.0 |
| Treatment of pulmonary
embolism |
2.0-3.0 |
| Prophylaxis of venous
thrombosis (high-risk surgery) |
2.0-3.0 |
| Prevention of systemic
embolism |
2.0-3.0 |
| |
Tissue heart valves |
2.0-3.0 |
| |
AMI (to prevent systemic embolism)+ |
2.0-3.0 |
| |
Valvular heart disease |
2.0-3.0 |
| |
Atrial fibrillation |
2.0-3.0 |
| Bileaflet mechanical
valve in aortic position |
2.0-3.0 |
| Mechanical prosthetic
valves (high risk) |
2.5-3.5 |
| Systemic recurrent emboli
|
2.5-3.5 |
*Adapted
from reference 1.
+If oral anticoagulant therapy is elected
to prevent recurrent myocardial
infarction, an INR of 2.5 to 3.5 is
recommended,
consistent with recommendations of the
Food and Drug Administration.
AMI indicates acute myocardial
infarction; INR, international normalized
ratio. |
One of the major risks of
warfarin therapy is bleeding, which correlates
well with INR values. The Fifth American College
of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Consensus Conference
on Antithrombotic Therapy has published
guidelines on the management of patients
with high INR values with or without bleeding (Table
2).
| Table 2. Management of
supratherapeutic INR values* |
| INR |
Patient situation |
Action |
| 3.1-5.0 |
No bleeding or need for rapid
reversal
(i.e., no need for surgery) |
Omit next few warfarin doses and/or
restart at lower dose when INR approaches
desired range. If the INR is only
minimally above range, no dosage
reduction may
be required. |
| 5.1-9.0 |
No bleeding or need for rapid
reversal
No bleeding but reversal needed for
surgery
or dental extraction within 24 hours
|
Omit next 1-2 doses, monitor INR more
frequently, and restart at lower dose
when INR approaches target range or omit
dose and give 1-2.5 mg vitamin K1
orally (use this if patient has risk
factor for bleeding). Vitamin K1 2-4
mg orally (expected reversal within 24
hours); give additional
1-2 mg if INR remains high at 24 hours.
|
| 9.1-20.0 |
No bleeding. |
Stop warfarin; give vitamin K1 3-5 mg
orally; follow INR closely; repeat
vitamin K1
if needed. Reassess need and dose of
warfarin when INR approaches desirable
range. |
Rapid reversal
required (>20.0) |
Serious bleeding or major warfarin
overdose. |
Stop warfarin; give vitamin K1 10 mg
by slow IV infusion. May repeat vitamin
K1
every 12 hours and give fresh plasma
transfusion or prothrombin complex
concentrate as needed. When appropriate,
heparin can be given until the patient
becomes responsive to warfarin. |
Life-threatening
bleeding |
|
Replace with prothrombin complex
concentrate and give 10 mg of vitamin K1
by infusion. May repeat if needed. |
| *From
reference 1. |
WARFARIN DRUG UTILIZATION
EVALUATION
Criteria for warfarin administration were
developed that were supported by the medical
literature and approved by the Drug Utilization
Evaluation Subcommittee of the Pharmacy and
Therapeutics Committee. A computer-generated
report of all patients receiving warfarin was
generated daily from July 24, 2000, to August 20,
2000. The information gathered was entered into
Microsoft Access, and 50 patients were randomly
selected to be included in the evaluation. A
retrospective chart review was conducted for the
patients identified through this randomized
process. Descriptive and inferential statistics
(chi-square, t test) were utilized for
data analysis.
Overall, results identified 4 main variances
related to warfarin therapy: 1) inappropriate
administration of a warfarin loading dose, 2)
inappropriate use of vitamin K, 3) inconsistent
overlapping of heparin with warfarin, and 4)
inconsistent provision of patient education.
Patients who are given a loading dose of
warfarin often reach a supratherapeutic INR level
that can place a patient at risk for bleeding and
prolonged hospital stay. This complication has
been attributed to excessive depression of factor
VII and protein C (2, 5). The ACCP supports an
induction dose (rather than a large
loading dose) for initiation of therapy. This
induction dose can range from 2 to 5 mg per day
and is adjusted according to the patient's INR
(1).
Inappropriate use of vitamin K can be improved
by following the guidelines for dosing of vitamin
K developed by the Fifth ACCP Consensus
Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy (1). It is
important to use vitamin K only when recommended,
because inappropriate administration of vitamin K
is associated with warfarin resistance. When such
resistance develops, it is difficult to achieve a
therapeutic INR in a timely manner, which may
result in an increased risk of clotting events.
Another area of improvement relates to the
practice of overlapping heparin with warfarin
therapy. Heparin displays an anticoagulant effect
within 1 day, while the anticoagulant effects of
warfarin are not evident until the third day of
therapy. If rapid anticoagulant effects are
needed, heparin should be initiated first, and
warfarin should be started within a day or two.
The 2 drugs should be given concurrently until
the INR value is within the therapeutic range
(1-3).
Lastly, since warfarin has a narrow
therapeutic window and has been associated with
many drug-drug and drug-food interactions,
patient counseling is crucial. The evaluation
revealed this as an area for improvement because
opportunities for patient education were not
always optimized.
Initiation and management of warfarin therapy
is often difficult. Guidelines have been
developed to assist the clinician in determining
target ranges for therapeutic success. In
addition, strategies for rapid anticoagulation
and management of supratherapeutic INR values are
also described in the literature. Daily practice
using these guidelines should make management of
patients easier when warfarin therapy is
required.
- Hirsh J, Dalen JE,
Anderson DR, Poller L, Bussey H, Ansell
J, Deykin D, Brandt JT. Oral
anticoagulants: mechanism of action,
clinical effectiveness, and optimal
therapeutic range. Chest
1998;114(5 Suppl):445S-469S.
- Horton JD, Bushwick BM.
Warfarin therapy: evolving strategies in
anticoagulation. Am Fam Physician
1999;59:635-646.
- Micromedex. Warfarin drug
evaluations. Micromedex@Healthcare Series
2000;106.
- Dager WE, Branch JM, King
JH, White RH, Quan RS, Musallam NA,
Albertson TE. Optimization of inpatient
warfarin therapy: impact of daily
consultation by a pharmacist-managed
anticoagulation service. Ann
Pharmacother 2000;34:567-572.
- Lamb GC. Loading dose of
warfarin. JAMA 1997;277:1196.
.
|