n this issue of Baylor
University Medical Center Proceedings, Drs. Roger and
Rainer Khetan simply and effectively describe the working
definition of quality for the Medicare program, the
current Texas rankings for Medicare's national quality
indicators, and the efforts of Baylor Health Care System
(BHCS) to improve quality in these areas. The quality
improvement efforts highlighted in this article
demonstrate BHCS's role as a leader in improving care for
Medicare beneficiaries in Texas. The authors highlight 2 critical
aspects of successful quality improvement initiatives:
engaging physicians as quality leaders and using a
multidisciplinary team approach. Because physicians
manage patient care and determine therapeutic
interventions, they have significant control over
resource utilization. It is critical, therefore, to
engage physicians in quality improvement efforts. A key
step in engaging physicians is to focus on critical
aspects of care for relevant clinical topics. Towards
this end, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA)
and the peer review organizations (PROs) introduced the
health care quality improvement program (HCQIP) in 1992
(1). HCQIP represents a shift from individual case review
looking for the bad apples to profiling of
population-based patterns of disease-specific care in an
effort to identify unintentional variations in care. This
new approach assigns no blame. Instead, it looks for
process changes within systems of care that will produce
improved outcomes (2).
To focus HCQIP, 6 topics
were chosen for national quality improvement efforts. To
be included, a clinical topic must impact a large number
of Medicare beneficiaries and cause significant morbidity
or mortality. Next, scientific evidence must exist that
links selected quality measures to improved outcomes and
identifies valid and reliable data collection
methodologies. Last, there must be evidence supporting
variation in the actual application of these selected
quality measures and an indication that Medicare PROs,
working with their partners, can positively improve the
selected measures (3). Even meeting these criteria, HCFA
recognizes that a quality indicator cannot be applied to
all patients. As such, extensive exclusion criteria have
been utilized to ensure that physicians have the freedom
to use clinical judgment in decision making.
As the state PRO, Texas
Medical Foundation (TMF) has a role in the HCQIP process:
to help Texas providers build the capacity to conduct
their own data-driven improvement projects, while at the
same time encouraging the use of processes that
help them achieve benchmark performance for all of the
quality indicators. TMF focuses on the systems approach
to quality improvement. Because a system is defined as
any set of processes linked together to produce an
outcome, changing any process in a system will modify the
outcome for better or worse. As such, prior to
implementing any process change, an organization must
understand the process steps in its current system and
have baseline data documenting the performance of that
system. Once a process change is implemented, data must
be collected to ensure that the change positively
impacted the desired outcome. A single process change
rarely produces the degree of desired improvement;
therefore, it is critical to undertake multiple quality
improvement cycles to reach benchmark levels.
When analyzing a system,
it is obvious that many health care professionals affect
the delivery of care provided to patients. This
highlights the authors' second point. Quality improvement
cannot be performed by a single group of professionals
(e.g., physicians, pharmacists, or nurses). As such, the
authors are correct in identifying the need for a
multidisciplinary approach to quality improvement. Only
by engaging all groups who provide patient care can the
quality improvement process be successful.
The Texas baseline ranks
for the HCQIP quality indicators cannot be explained by
inappropriate topic or quality indicator selection. They
cannot be explained by a failure to recognize necessary
exclusions. These data represent a call to action for all
health care providers in Texas and throughout the nation.
TMF supports and applauds the quality improvement
efforts undertaken by BHCS. Through their efforts, and
the quality improvement efforts of many similar
health care providers throughout the state, Texas
will meet the challenge and respond fully to this call to
action. To learn more about the services and resources
available from TMF, call 1-800-725-9216.
- Jencks SF, Wilensky GR.
The health care quality improvement initiative. A
new approach to quality assurance in Medicare. JAMA
1992;268:900-903.
- Pendergrass PW, Abel RL,
Bing M, Vaughn R, McCauley C. Methodology of
quality improvement projects for the Texas
Medicare population. Tex Med
1998;94:54-60.
- Jencks SF, Cuerdon T,
Burwen DR, Fleming B, Houck PM, Kussmaul AE,
Nilasena DS, Ordin DL, Arday DR. Quality of
medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries:
A profile at state and national levels. JAMA
2000;284:1670-1676.
|