espite
all of the positive research and trial data about statins
and other pharmacologic interventions for treating
elevated cholesterol, patients do not take these drugs.
In my practice, patients, even those with very high
lipids and known heart disease, ask if they could try to
lower their cholesterol with diet alone. Or, if they have
already started a statin, they want to stop it because of
side effects or cost. Drug companies note that upwards of
30% of patients initiated on statins do not continue
their prescriptions. These reasons warrant a review of
the efficacy of dietary and nonpharmacologic measures to
lower cholesterol compared with pharmacologic therapy. DIET
Unfortunately, even the strict very low saturated fat,
low-cholesterol American Heart Association Step 2 diet
(see Table) only minimally lowers serum
cholesterol. Hunninghake et al found a mean 5% reduction
in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in patients
following this program and discouragingly found an
equivalent 6% fall in high-density lipoprotein (HDL)
cholesterol, so that ratios were unchanged (1). Low-fat
diets as commonly prescribed rarely produce significant
LDL declines. Studies performed on controlled metabolic
units where intakes are rigidly enforced can demonstrate
cholesterol reductions of 15% with diet alone; however,
in the real world, people can rarely replicate these
results (2).
One exception to this, however, is the Dean
Ornish-style diet, which was studied in the Lifestyle
Heart Trial (3). This vegetarian diet consists of fruits,
vegetables, soybean products, nonfat milk, and yogurt
with no oils or animal products (Table).
Roughly 7% of calories are from fat, 15% to 20% from
protein, and the remainder from complex carbohydrates.
Only 12 mg of cholesterol per day is allowed. This
prohibition of oils, including olive and canola oil,
contrasts with other low-fat diets. Ornish believes that
all oils are fundamentally unhealthy as they contain both
saturated and unsaturated fats in addition to many
calories.
On average, Ornish's patients lost 24 lbs in a year
and had a 37% reduction in LDL cholesterol levels (HDL
cholesterol levels were unchanged). What is most
provocative about this diet/lifestyle program is that
there was a 91% reduction in angina frequency and a
significant degree of angiographically measured coronary
stenosis regression. It is unclear to what degree
other lifestyle modifications such as exercise and stress
reduction, which are integral parts of the Ornish
program, play in these results. Based upon these
favorable findings, the National Institutes of Health is
embarking upon a multimillion-dollar study of the Ornish
diet vs bypass surgery in patients with coronary disease.
The problem with the Ornish diet is it is so stringent
that most Americans find adhering to it nearly
impossible. In addition, critics of this study note that
it had only 48 subjects; thus, the outcome should be
viewed skeptically until larger trials are completed. The
greatest scientific objection to the Ornish-style diet is
that it is now known that high-carbohydrate, low-fat
diets raise triglyceride levels, lower HDL levels, and
may convert LDL lipoproteins into smaller, denser, and
more atherogenic particles (4). Nevertheless, the Ornish
diet provides the greatest absolute LDL reduction
available by diet alone and is of a magnitude similar to
that of high-dose statin therapy, which can reduce
cholesterol by 25% to 60% depending upon the drug dose
(5).
More widely studied and perhaps more practical for the
treatment of patients with coronary artery disease is the
Mediterranean diet (Table). In the 1950s, Ancel
Keys began studying the dietary habits of 1770
inhabitants of various countries and correlating them
with subsequent mortality (6). His landmark study found
that the mortality rates from heart disease were 2 to 3
times lower in the countries bordering the Mediterranean
Sea compared with Northern Europe and the USA. Keys
correlated the findings with the intake of saturated fat,
a relationship that has remained valid at a 25-year
follow-up. Of the separate Mediterranean cohorts studied,
a population from the island of Crete had a strikingly
low cardiac mortality, just 2% that of Northern Europe
and 5% that of other Mediterranean countries. It was
estimated that this Cretan population had the greatest
life expectancy of any group in the Western world (7).
From the 1950s to the 1970s, Keys examined and wrote
extensively about the composition of what he called a
good Mediterranean diet and, as a result of
his research, devised formulas predictive of serum
cholesterol levels based upon dietary fat intake (8).
Nevertheless, this diet has not been widely embraced in
the cardiology community.
Recently, researchers in Lyon, France, prospectively
studied the effects of the Cretan Mediterranean diet on a
group of 605 postmyocardial infarction patients (9).
Patients were randomized either to the Cretan diet or to
a prudent diet similar in composition to the
American Heart Association Step 1 diet (control group).
All other aspects of the patients' health care were
identical. An astonishing 70% reduction in the incidence
of subsequent death and nonfatal myocardial infarction
was reported in patients on the Mediterranean diet after
a mean follow-up of 27 months, a ratio that was
maintained through a final 48-month mean follow-up (10).
Even more remarkable is that this mortality benefit
occurred despite no difference between the study and the
control populations in follow-up LDL and HDL cholesterol
levels and only a very modest 6% drop in total
cholesterol levels in both groups from 250 mg/dL to 237
mg/dL. The magnitude of benefit reported with the diet
alone should be contrasted with that achievable by other
routine secondary prevention therapies, including statin
drugs (35% event reduction) (11), beta-blockers (15%
reduction), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
(20% reduction) (12).
A number of hypotheses have been advanced to explain
how this diet provides benefit independent of its effect
on cholesterol levels. One early theory that attributed
the longevity benefit to living a relaxed lifestyle on an
idyllic Greek island is refuted by the trial being
conducted in metropolitan France. Another potential
mechanism is that a diet rich in fruits and legumes
provides folic acid, which may reduce cardiac risk by
lowering plasma homocysteine (13). Also, moderate alcohol
consumption is associated with decreased cardiovascular
risk in part by increasing HDL levels (14), and both red
wine and some Mediterranean plant foods contain large
amounts of flavenoids, which are natural antioxidant and
antithrombotic substances (15). But the most provocative
explanation, advanced by the principal investigators, is
that the prudent diet contains
linoleic acid as an important component whereas the
Mediterranean diet contains a-linolenic acid (16).
Although both are 18 carbon fatty acids, a-linolenic acid
is an omega-3 fatty acid and linoleic is an omega-6 fatty
acid. Increased linoleic intake has been shown to promote
platelet aggregation and oxidation of LDL. Alternatively,
a-linolenic acid has antithrombotic properties and may
also be antiarrhythmic (9). a-Linolenic acid is a
precursor of other omega-3 fatty acids found in fish and
fish oil such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), which may
have independent beneficial effects that are discussed
later in this review. If, indeed, high intakes of
linoleic acid are actually harmful, conformity to the
prudent diet, as conventionally advocated,
may be most imprudent.
The results of the Lyon Heart Study have turned the
field of dietary therapy of cholesterol disorders upside
down. The time-honored primary goal of diets, namely
lowering cholesterol levels, becomes far less relevant
than adjusting the composition of the nutritional intake.
The beneficial effect of the diet occurs despite
seemingly trivial cholesterol reductions. The major
difficulty of this new dietary approach for physicians
will be the inability to easily measure compliance or
success, as specific serum fatty acid levels are not
practical to obtain.
EXERCISE
Coupling a low-fat diet with exercise produces better
results than diet alone. It is known that exercise can
raise the HDL level. Wood et al found that adding regular
exercise (approximately 9 miles of walking or jogging per
week) to a Step 1 low-fat diet in obese patients produced
a 13% increase in HDL cholesterol levels, which offsets
the small decline typically seen on a low-fat diet alone
(17). This same group expanded these findings to a cohort
of nonobese patients with high LDL and low HDL levels. At
1 year, those randomized to a Step 2 diet alone had a 7%
to 11% decrease in LDL levels, which was statistically
significant. Coupling diet with an exercise program of 10
miles of walking or jogging per week produced a more
substantial 14% to 20% decrease in LDL cholesterol levels
(18).
Weight loss, in and of itself, has salutary effects on
lipid profile. These same investigators, in separate
studies of obese patients, found that weight loss,
achieved either through diet or exercise, resulted in
equivalent increases in HDL cholesterol levels and
reductions in triglyceride levels (19). It is especially
important to identify and target a subset of patients who
have the recently described insulin resistance
syndrome. Typically these patients have central
obesity or a relatively large abdomen, glucose
intolerance, and hypertension. They have a characteristic
lipid pattern with low HDL levels, high triglyceride
levels, and smaller, dense LDL particles. In these
patients weight loss alone can have a dramatically
beneficial effect on lipid profiles (20).
PHYTOSTEROLS
Plants contain a compound very similar in structure to
cholesterol. These phyto (or plant) sterols (sitosterol
[24-ethylcholesterol] and campesterol
[24-methylcholesterol]) occur naturally in small
quantities in many plants, such as corn, soybeans, and
sunflower seeds. It has been known since the mid- 1950s
that ingesting large quantities of these sterols
decreases cholesterol levels by interfering with
absorption of cholesterol. Although these sterols are
poorly absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract, they
compete effectively with cholesterol for inclusion in
mixed micelles, a necessary step for cholesterol
absorption. Unable to enter the micelle, cholesterol is
unabsorbed and serum levels decline. These plant
molecules have been further engineered to make them more
potent and palatable. Hydrogenated sitosterol,
sitostanol, is itself unabsorbed by the gastrointestinal
tract but competes even more effectively for micelles. It
can be esterified in canola oil and included in food
products such as margarine and salad oil. This is the
genesis of the functional food product
Benecol. Benecol was introduced in Finland in 1995 and is
available in the USA as margarine, salad oil, or snack
bars. Several large studies have shown that ingestion of
2 to 4 g a day of sitostanol (2 to 3 servings) lowers the
total cholesterol by 10% and the LDL level by 14% (21).
HDL and triglyceride levels are not altered. Because the
sitostanol is completely unabsorbed, no systemic side
effects (and specifically no gastrointestinal side
effects) are reported. It is estimated that sitostanol
reduces cholesterol absorption by 33% to 66%.
Interestingly, most people have elevated cholesterol
levels because of increased hepatic lipoprotein synthesis
rather than because of hyperabsorption. The former
metabolic pathway is what statins target through
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA)
reductase inhibition. However, a group of
patients--perhaps 20% of people--responds poorly to
statins; their elevated cholesterol is derived more from
hyperabsorption of cholesterol rather than from enhanced
hepatic synthesis (22). These patients do especially well
with Benecol. Adding Benecol to the regimens of patients
who have inadequate responses to statin drugs has been
advanced as a logical strategy to interfere with
synthesis as well as absorption.
Theoretically, combining a low-fat diet and exercise
program with Benecol would produce additive
cholesterol-lowering effects. Assuming one could achieve
a 15% LDL cholesterol reduction with a Step 2 diet and
exercise and an additional 15% reduction with Benecol, a
LDL cholesterol reduction of 30% might be
possible--rivaling the results of some statins. We would
not expect a benefit of this magnitude to be achieved,
however, because the lower the total cholesterol
presented in the diet, the less meaningful any reduction
in absorption. For example, Benecol is unlikely to add
anything to an Ornish diet. Plant sterols from soybeans
are available in the margarine Take Control.
It has been compared with Benecol in studies and appears
to have similar efficacy.
The public health benefits of plant stanol and sterol
use have been underappreciated (23). Incorporated widely
into the American diet, these products could produce a
30% reduction in the incidence of coronary disease, as it
is known that every 1% reduction in LDL cholesterol
decreases the risk of coronary disease by 2% over a
lifetime.
As a side note, the use of plant sterols has focused
light on an obscure disorder, familial phytosterolemia,
an exotic autosomal-recessive disease in which
homozygotes have increased absorption of phytosterols,
high levels of sitosterol and camposterol, and premature
atherosclerosis development. I mention this only to
contemplate the fascinating scenario of inadvertently
feeding increased plant sterol to susceptible patients.
This will join the very short list of diseases from which
one can die by being a strict vegetarian (24).
FIBER
Soluble fibers--such as psyllium, oat bran, guar gum,
and pectin--have been shown to reduce cholesterol levels
in multiple studies, although the mechanism of benefit is
debated. Most studies have few subjects and are of short
duration but consistently show that the inclusion of 10
to 30 g of soluble fiber in a diet results in an
approximately 10% reduction in LDL cholesterol. HDL and
triglyceride levels remain unchanged (25). Some
investigators feel that the fiber actually binds
cholesterol or bile salts in the gut and prevents its
absorption, working in a way similar to that of
cholestyramine. Other investigators have evidence showing
that intake of fiber simply reduces the subsequent
ingestion of saturated fat and cholesterol (26). Simply
put, filling up with a bowl of cereal decreases that
craving for a sausage patty. It should be noted, however,
that with 1 serving of Cheerios containing just 1 g of
soluble fiber and 1 teaspoon of Metamucil containing 2.3
g of psyllium fiber, it takes a prodigious consumption to
equal the desired 10 to 30 g a day, so if you consume the
recommended amount, you are definitely already
full.
SOY PRODUCTS
Another dietary variation that can lower cholesterol
is the substitution of vegetable protein for animal
protein in the diet using soy-based products. Replacing 2
servings of milk with soy milk and 1 serving of meat with
tofu will lower cholesterol, LDL, and triglyceride levels
(27). The magnitude of benefit is greater the higher
one's baseline cholesterol, with an expected 7% to 10%
reduction for those with moderate cholesterol elevations
(200 to 330 mg/dL) who add 30 g a day of soy product to
their diet. The mechanism of benefit is uncertain and may
be due to phytoestrogens in the soybean, which exert a
salutary effect on lipid profiles similar to that of
estrogen.
FISH OIL
The lipid-lowering benefits of eating fish have been
well known since epidemiologists noted that Greenland
Eskimos had a low coronary mortality compared with Danes.
Danes eat a high-fat diet. Eskimos eat a high-fat,
high-cholesterol diet but one rich in fish, especially
those containing the omega-3 fatty acids EPA and
docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). These fatty acids lower
plasma very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and
triglyceride concentrations by depressing synthesis of
triglycerides in the liver. Also, the normal postprandial
hypertriglyceridemia and chylomicronemia are dramatically
decreased by ingesting fish oil. Accordingly, fish oil is
especially effective at lowering elevated VLDL and
chylomicron levels; HDL is not significantly lowered, and
LDL effects are variable and highly individualized. In
some patients LDL levels will rise, and in others they
will fall. Those with significant VLDL and chylomicron
elevations are most benefited by incorporating fish or
fish oil into their diets (28).
It is suggested that eating 200 to 300 g per week of
fish or shellfish (or 2 to 3 fish meals per week) will
produce an Eskimo-like preventive benefit on coronary
disease. Those fish especially rich in omega-3 fatty
acids are anchovies, herring, mackerel, sardines, and
salmon. Concentrated omega-3 fish oils are widely
available, and 2 to 3 g a day of a 30% concentrate are
recommended for those who won't eat fish. You need to
look carefully at the product label, however, because
fish oil capsules can contain anywhere from 30% to 85%
omega-3 fatty acids. Alternatively, pharmacological
effects of fish oil on elevated triglycerides and
chylomicrons can be achieved with 6 to 15 g a day of fish
oil (or 3 to 5 g a day of omega-3 fatty acids). This
requires ingesting 10 to 12 tablets of 30%-fish oil
concentrate a day. Reduction in triglyceride and
chylomicron levels of 60% to 90% have been reported in
patients with elevated VLDL and chylomicron levels (29).
Two large prospective studies have reviewed the
benefit of fish oil. The Diet and Reinfarction Trial
(DART) randomized 2033 men to either a low-fat diet, a
high-fiber diet, or a 200- to 400-g per week fish diet
(30). There was a remarkable 29% reduction in all-cause
mortality at 2 years in the fish diet group vs the other
2 groups. An even larger 62% reduction in ischemic heart
disease death was noted in those patients who chose to
take fish oil tablets (900 mg omega-3 per day) rather
than eat fish. Fish oil has antithrombotic,
antiarrhythmic, and anti-inflammatory properties in
addition to lipid-lowering effects, which probably
account for these results. This may help explain the
beneficial results found in the a-linolenic acid-rich
Mediterranean diet, as a-
linolenic acid is converted to DHA and EPA in the body.
DART, however, had a number of confounding factors in its
intricate multifactorial design, and the results are
tantalizing but not convincing.
The larger GISSI Prevention Study randomized 11,324
Italians with recent myocardial infarctions to 850 mg of
omega-3 fatty acids per day, 300 mg of vitamin E per day,
neither, or both (31). In the fish oil group there was a
statistically significant 20% reduction in total
mortality at 3.5 years and a more striking 45% reduction
in sudden death, reinforcing a possible antiarrhythmic
property of omega-3 fatty acids. Although this study was
not designed to investigate this hypothesis, a large
majority of the study subjects appeared to be eating components
of a Mediterranean diet at baseline, and the extra fish
oil produced additive benefits.
SUMMARY
A number of dietary recommendations for patients with
elevated cholesterol levels or coronary artery disease
show evidence of benefit. In particular, striking
mortality benefits have been reported independently of
cholesterol-lowering effects. In terms of practical
application both for primary and secondary prevention,
the Mediterranean diet is both palatable and affordable
and is supported by strong epidemiological and control
trial data. Combining a Mediterranean diet with a
cholesterol-lowering margarine and emphasizing added fish
or fish oil would theoretically further augment this
effectiveness.
For patients with proven coronary artery disease,
however, a target LDL level of <100 mg/dL is
recommended, a goal that will probably be further lowered
in the next series of consensus guidelines. The vast
majority of these patients will require pharmacologic
therapy to achieve these goals. Dietary modifications
should not be overlooked, however, as they are likely to
provide additive benefits.
- Hunninghake
DB, Stein EA, Dujovne CA, Harris WS, Feldman
EB, Miller VT, Tobert JA, Laskarzewski PM,
Quiter E, Held J, Taylor AM, Hopper S,
Leonard SB, Brewer BK. The efficacy of
intensive dietary therapy alone or combined
with lovastatin in outpatients with
hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med
1993;328:1213-1219.
- Schaefer EJ,
Brosseau ME. Diet, lipoproteins, and coronary
heart disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North
Am 1998;27:711-727.
- Ornish D,
Brown SE, Scherwitz LW, Billings JH,
Armstrong WT, Ports TA, McLanahan SM,
Kirkeeide RL, Brand RJ, Gould KL. Can
lifestyle changes reverse coronary heart
disease? The Lifestyle Heart Trial. Lancet
1990;336:129-133.
- Grundy SM.
What is the desirable ratio of saturated,
polyunsaturated, and monounsaturated fatty
acids in the diet? Am J Clin Nutr
1997;66(Suppl):988S-990S.
- Knopp RH. Drug
treatment of lipid disorders. N Engl J Med
1999;341:498-511.
- Keys A, ed.
Coronary heart disease in seven countries.
American Heart Association monograph 29. Circulation
1970;41(Suppl 1):1-211.
- Blackburn H.
The low risk coronary male. Am J Cardiol
1986;58:161.
- Keys A,
Anderson JT, Grande F. Serum cholesterol
response to changes in the diet, IV:
particular saturated fatty acids in the diet.
Metabolism 1965;14:776-787.
- Renaud S, de
Lorgeril M, Delaye J, Guidollet J, Jacquard
F, Mamelle N, Martin JL, Monjaur I, Salen P,
Toubol P. Cretan Mediterranean diet for
prevention of coronary heart disease. Am J
Clin Nutr 1995;61(6 Suppl):1360S-1367S.
- de Lorgeril M,
Salen P, Martin JL, Monjaud I, Delaye J,
Mamelle N. Mediterranean diet, traditional
risk factors, and the rate of cardiovascular
complications after myocardial infarction:
final report of the Lyon Diet Heart Study. Circulation
1999;99:779-785.
- Jacobson TA,
Schein JR, Williamson A, Ballantyne CM.
Maximizing the cost-effectiveness of
lipid-lowering therapy. Arch Intern Med
1998;158:1977-1989.
- Braunwald E,
ed. Heart Disease: A Textbook of
Cardiovascular Medicine. Philadelphia: WB
Saunders, 1997:1228-1229.
- Nygard O,
Nordrehaug JE, Refsum H, Ueland PM, Farstad
M, Vollset SE. Plasma homocysteine levels and
mortality in patients with coronary artery
disease. N Engl J Med
1997;337:230-236.
- Gaziano JM,
Buring JE, Breslow JL, Goldhaber SZ, Rosner
B, VanDenburgh M, Willett W, Hennekens CH.
Moderate alcohol intake, increased levels of
high density lipoprotein and its
subfractions, and decreased risk of
myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med
1993;329:1829-1834.
- Trichopoulou
A, Vasilopoulou E, Liagiou A. Mediterranean
diet and coronary heart disease: are
antioxidants critical? Nutr Rev
1999;57:253-255.
- de Lorgeril M,
Renaud S, Mamelle N, Salen P, Martin JL,
Monjaud I, Guidollet J, Touboul P, Delaye J.
Mediterranean alpha-linolenic acid-rich diet
in secondary prevention of coronary heart
disease. Lancet 1994;343:1454-1459.
- Wood PD,
Stefanick ML, Williams, PT, Haskell WL. The
effects on plasma lipoproteins of a prudent
weight-reducing diet, with or without
exercise, in overweight men and women. N
Engl J Med 1991;325:461-466.
- Stefanick ML,
Mackey S, Sheehan M, Ellsworth N, Haskell WL,
Wood PD. Effects of diet and exercise in men
and postmenopausal women with low levels of
HDL cholesterol and high levels of LDL
cholesterol. N Engl J Med
1998;339:12-20.
- Wood PD,
Stefanick ML, Dreon DM, Frey-Hewitt B, Garay
SC, Williams PT, Superko HR, Fortmann SP,
Albers JJ, Vranizan KM, Ellsworth NM, Terry
RB, Haskell L. Changes in plasma lipids and
lipoproteins in overweight men during weight
loss through dieting as compared with
exercise. N Engl J Med
1988;319:1173-1179.
- Grundy SM.
Hypertriglyceridemia, insulin resistance, and
the metabolic syndrome. Am J Cardiol
1999;83:25F-29F.
- Miettinen TA,
Puska P, Gylling H, Vanhanan H, Vartiainen E.
Reduction of serum cholesterol with
sitostanol-ester margarine in a mildly
hypercholesterolemic population. N Engl J
Med 1995;333:1308-1312.
- Thompson GR.
Poor responders to statins: a potential
target for stanol esters. European Heart
Journal Supplements 1999;1(Suppl
S):S114-S117.
- Grundy SM.
Stanol esters as a dietary adjunct to
cholesterol-lowering therapies. European
Heart Journal Supplements
1999;1(Suppl S):S132-S138.
- Thompson GR.
Plant lipids that lower serum cholesterol. Eur
Heart J 1999;20:1527-1529.
- Hunninghake
DB, Miller VT, LaRosa JC, Kinosian B,
Jacobson T, Brown V, James WH, Edelman D,
O'Connor RR. Long-term treatment of
hypercholesterolemia with dietary fiber. Am
J Med 1994;97:504-508.
- Swain JF,
Rouse IL, Curley CB, Sacks FM. Comparison of
the effects of oat bran and low-fiber wheat
on serum lipoprotein levels and blood
pressure. N Engl J Med
1990;322:147-152.
- Anderson JW,
Johnstone BM, Cook-Newell ME. Meta-analysis
of the effects of soy protein intake on serum
lipids. N Engl J Med 1995;333:276-282.
- Connor SL,
Connor WE. Are fish oils beneficial in the
prevention and treatment of coronary artery
disease? Am J Clin Nutr
1997;66(Suppl):1020S-1031S.
- O'Keefe JH,
Harris WS. From Inuit to implementation:
omega-3 fatty acids come of age. Mayo Clin
Proc 2000;75:607-614.
- Burr ML,
Fehily AM, Gilbert JF, Rogers S, Holliday RM,
Sweetman PM, Elwood PC, Deadman NM. Effects
of changes in fat, fish, and fibre intakes on
death and myocardial reinfarction: diet and
reinfarction trial. Lancet
1989;2:757-761.
- Dietary supplementation with
n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E
after myocardial infarction: results of the
GISSI-Prevenzione trial. Gruppo Italiano per
lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto
miocardico. Lancet 1999;354:447-455.
|