any
work environments expose workers to extremely hot and
humid conditions. The most vivid example of this is the
firefighter, who inevitably must tolerate heat stress as
part of the risks inherent to his or her job. Whereas the
worker is expected to report imminent heat exhaustion
before catastrophe occurs, ultimately the employer is
held liable by the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) for providing a safe work
environment for its workers. Therefore, it is incumbent
upon employers to screen workers for susceptibility and
to rotate workers in and out of a hot work environment so
as to prevent deleterious health outcomes, even
fatalities.
Heat-related illness is a problem
for many types of workers: metal smelters, outdoor
construction and law enforcement workers, plastics
manufacturing workers, landscaping and recreation
maintenance personnel, staff in warehouses without air
conditioning, cooks and kitchen workers, and athletes. A
number of human factors contribute to a worker's
susceptibility to heat stress, such as medical
conditions, increasing age, overall level of fitness,
presence of other metabolically stressful illnesses, the
use of certain medications, dehydration, alcohol intake,
and individual ability to acclimatize to extreme
temperatures. Environmental factors that can contribute
to heat stress besides high ambient temperature are low
convection currents, high humidity, low evaporative loss,
and high insulation levels around the body.
Acclimatization is defined as the time needed for
physiological adaptation to extreme temperature changes.
An average individual takes about 1 to 2 weeks to adapt
to extreme cold or hot temperatures. Successful
acclimatization occurs if the physiologic mechanisms of
the cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal systems
interrelate effectively to adjust the body's core
temperature by using evaporative heat loss or
conservation. The process of acclimatization requires
intact and responsive cardiovascular and renal systems.
The National Institute of Occupational Safety and
Health has recommended that post-offer and surveillance
examinations for heat stress include a complete history
and physical examination to screen for relative or
absolute contraindications to hot environments (1). These
recommendations were made with the intent to screen
workers who are more susceptible to heat stress before a
catastrophic event occurs in the workplace. No specific
examination exists to screen workers' susceptibility to
hot environments. However, specific questions directed at
screening for risk factors for heat stress can be
included in the medical history to identify susceptible
individuals. These questions should highlight factors
that are relative or absolute contraindications to
prolonged exposure to hot environments.

Factors that may contribute to the tendency to develop
heat-related illnesses are considered relative
contraindications to heat stress exposure (Table 1).
Absolute contraindications are factors that are
definitely known to contribute to heat-related illnesses (Table
2).

Relative contraindications to hot environments need to
be assessed on a case-by-case basis, based on severity
and lability of the worker's condition. For example, a
severely hypertensive worker is more at risk than a
moderately hypertensive worker. The person with severe
hypertension is more likely to decompensate sooner than
one with moderate hypertension.
Besides evaluating a worker with a complete history
and physical examination, environmental monitoring with a
wet bulb globe thermometer is recommended. This
instrument measures ambient humidity, which has additive
heat stress effects on human physiology.
Recommended ambient temperature limits vary, as the
ambient humidity and convection factors vary. That is to
say, as the humidity increases, the recommended
temperature limits decrease. As the convection factors
decrease, the recommended temperature limits decrease.
Human factors such as an excessively rapid pulse (>90
beats per minute) with slow recovery time after exercise
(more than 3 minutes) and/or an elevated baseline core
temperature (>100.4?F) indicate a need for a rest
period to allow for recovery to baseline before re-entry
into the hot work area. Baseline measurements and
exercise recovery time can serve as indicators whether or
not a worker is fit to enter a hot environment at the
beginning of the workday. Recommended alert limits and
recommended exposure limit guidelines are encouraged by
OSHA. When workers are exposed to heat stress, biological
monitoring with the 3-minute pulse test recovery is
recommended during the hottest time of the day or the
hottest workplace location.
Absolute contraindications should be adhered to in
workplaces. Workers with these risk factors or conditions
should not be exposed to hot environments. If these risk
factors are not identified, poor or fatal health outcomes
may not be avoidable.
Exposure to a hot work environment requires that
workers be continuously hydrated. Fluid loss through
perspiration is genetically predetermined and
proportional to the number of sweat glands per square
inch of skin. Drinking water needs to be readily
available to workers exposed to a hot work environment.
Water misters are available that cool the skin
continuously when workers voluntarily walk by.
Construction crews at an outdoor worksite often use
these.
In conclusion, the next time a company calls your
office about a worker who has been overcome in a hot work
environment, the patient history and environmental
factors may be useful in helping you determine an
etiology and whether that worker can return safety to
that environment in the near or distant future, or maybe
not at all.
- NIOSH criteria documents for
preventive practices of heat stress illness. J
Occup Environ Med 1996;38:689-692.
|