| An
effective method for surgically repairing pectus
excavatum without removing the costal cartilages
was described by Nuss in 1998. With this
minimally invasive technique, 2 small incisions
are made on the lateral chest wall, and a convex
steel bar, contoured to the patient's chest, is
inserted under the sternum, with the convex
surface facing posteriorly. The bar is then
rotated 180? so that the convex surface elevates
the sternum and corrects the pectus deformity.
The bar is removed after 2 years, when permanent
remolding has occurred. The results have been
good to excellent. The procedure offers several
advantages over pectus repair in which cartilage
is removed, with or without strut support. It is
easier to perform, avoids having to make an
anterior chest incision, returns the patient to
full activity sooner, preserves elasticity of the
chest, and does not retard chest wall growth.
Currently, the ease of the Nuss technique makes
it the procedure of choice for surgical repair of
pectus excavatum. Furthermore, its long-term
benefits may be even greater. By preserving the
costal cartilages, the Nuss procedure maintains
chest elasticity and chest wall growth. Thus, it
avoids the restrictive effects associated with
costochondrectomy and has the potential to
improve both cardiac and pulmonary functions. |
n April
1998, Nuss reported an innovative surgical technique to
correct pectus excavatum that did not involve costal
cartilage removal or sternal osteotomy (1). Instead, a
convex, stainless steel bar is inserted through the
thoracic cavity to move the sternum forward. The genesis
of this technique was Nuss observations that
various skeletal deformities in children are successfully
treated by bracing or casting and that the adult thoracic
cavity develops a barrel shape with progressive
emphysema. Nuss reasoned that by forcing the sternum
forward with a bar, the deformed rib cartilages
responsible for the development of pectus excavatum could
be permanently remolded, after which the bar could be
removed. Nuss developed the technique over a 10-year
period, performing the operation on 42 patients between
the ages of 1 and 15 years.
Follow-up evaluation was performed
on 30 patients whose bar had been removed on average 2.8
years after surgery. The mean follow-up time from surgery
was 4.6 years. The results of the procedure were reported
as good to excellent in 26 (82%) patients. Early
postoperative improvement was maintained 1 year after the
bar had been removed. Five-year follow-up was available
for 16 patients. All of these patients maintained the
appearance achieved at 1 year after surgery. Four
patients had poor or fair results, which were attributed
to errors made during Nusss early experience with
the procedure. In 3 of these patients, the bars bent
because they were not sufficiently strong enough. The
fourth patient had Marfan syndrome, and the sternum
collapsed above and below the bar.
Operative complications in
Nuss series of 42 patients have been minor. Small,
residual pneumothoraces occurred in 3 patients, but none
required a chest tube to treat. Bar displacement occurred
twice in his early experience. Four patients developed
skin irritation because the bar was too weak and
straightened out. There was 1 wound infection, which
responded to antibiotics, and the bar did not have to be
removed.
Nuss operation offers
several advantages over the modified Ravitch procedure,
which involves costal cartilage removal, sternal
osteotomy, and the use of stainless steel struts for
temporary support in adolescent patients (2, 3). With the
Nuss procedure, the operating time is reduced.
Instability of the chest does not occur, and elasticity
of the chest is maintained. The surgical incision across
the chest is eliminated. Chest growth is not retarded,
and the patient is able to resume full activity sooner.
An estimated 500 Nuss procedures have been performed with
no reported deaths.
The ideal age for surgical repair
of pectus excavatum is before puberty. The
preadolescents chest is compliant, and the
patients remaining growth potential allows
remolding of the costal cartilages and continued growth
of the chest. The effectiveness of the Nuss procedure for
teenagers and adults is uncertain, as these patients lack
growth potential and their chests are less compliant. A
limited number of teenagers and adults have undergone the
procedure, and the early results have been good. Nuss
originally reported operating on 3 patients, ages 13.
The procedure has also worked well for recurrent pectus.
The most common complication for
surgeons learning the technique has been displacement of
the bar, which usually occurs within the first month
after surgery. However, with the addition of a
stabilizing cross bar, such displacement has been
virtually eliminated. Overcorrection can result in the
development of pectus carinatum.
SURGICAL PROCEDURE
Prior to surgery, a stainless
steel bar (Walter Lorenz Surgical, Jacksonville, Fla.) is
bent to conform to the contour of the patients
chest at the level of the deepest part of excavatum (Figure 1). The
bar is selected so that its length is sufficient to
extend from the mid-axillary line on 1 side of the
patients chest to the mid-axillary line on the
other side.
For the operation, the patient is
supine with the arms abducted. Incisions are made on the
sides of the chest between the anterior and posterior
axillary lines. Large subcutaneous pockets are created
anteriorly and posteriorly to accommodate the bar. A
Kelly or Crawford clamp is inserted through the
intercostal space in line with the deepest point of the
concavity and passed across the mediastinum directly
behind the sternum. The electrocardiogram is monitored
for arrhythmias during passage of the clamp, and passage
can be monitored with a thoracoscope. The point of the
clamp is pushed through the corresponding intercostal
space on the opposite side of the chest (Figure 2). An
umbilical tape is then tied to the bar, and the bar is
guided across the mediastinum (Figure 3). The
convex side of the bar faces posteriorly as it traverses
the mediastinum (Figure
4, top). The bar is then rotated
180? with a vise grip or rotational device (Walter
Lorenz Surgical, Jacksonville, Fla.) so that the convex
surface elevates the sternum (Figure 4,
bottom).
If the correction is deemed
unsatisfactory, the bar is turned over, removed from the
chest, and bent further so that an appropriate correction
of the deformity can be achieved. In some cases, a second
bar may be necessary for satisfactory correction. The
second bar is inserted 1 intercostal space above or below
the first bar. A cross bar is inserted on 1 end of the
bar for stabilization (Figure 5). The
convex bar and the stabilizing bar are firmly sutured to
the chest wall. Before the incision is closed, a positive
end expiratory pressure of 5 cm of water is added to
eliminate air from the chest. The surgical wounds are
then closed in layers. A chest radiograph is obtained in
the operating room to detect the presence of residual
pneumothorax. Any residual air is aspirated. A chest tube
is inserted only if there is significant pneumothorax.
POSTOPERATIVE PROTOCOL
Epidural anesthesia and
intravenous analgesics are used for postoperative pain
control. The patients are ambulated after the epidural
anesthesia is discontinued. They are discharged when they
are ambulatory and comfortable with oral analgesics.
Prophylactic postoperative antibiotic therapy consists of
cefazolin administered for the first 48 hours following
surgery. The bar is completely incorporated within a
month after surgery, and the patient is allowed to resume
full activity at that time. The bar is removed as an
outpatient procedure 2 years after insertion, when
permanent remolding has occurred.
INDICATIONS FOR SURGICAL
REPAIR
The indications for repair of
pectus excavatum are not altered because of the
development of the Nuss procedure. For a time, the role
of surgery in the management of pectus excavatum was
controversial, because improvement in cardiopulmonary
function could not be conclusively demonstrated (4). Many
physicians regarded the surgery as cosmetic rather than
functional. However, there are documented cardiopulmonary
abnormalities associated with pectus excavatum and
demonstrated benefits of repair with the deformity (5).
Because of the confusion regarding the physiologic
effects of pectus excavatum, the current knowledge of
cardiopulmonary function in patients with pectus
excavatum and the potential benefits of the Nuss repair
are reviewed.
The need for surgery is based on
the severity of the deformity and, if necessary, an
evaluation of the patients cardiac and pulmonary
functions. Most patients with pectus excavatum are
asymptomatic in early childhood. Deformities often are
mild in children <6 years but become more severe with
growth. Cardiac function at rest may not be altered, but
with exercise, cardiac output is restricted due to
sternal compression and displacement of the heart.
Worsening of the deformity and development of associated
symptoms occur commonly in adolescence. Symptoms include
decreased exercise tolerance, weakness, fatigue, dyspnea,
and tachycardia. Reactive airway disease is common in
children with pectus excavatum.
Young children with minimal
deformities and no symptoms can be managed with regular
follow-ups. If there is deep concavity, a chest dimension
index will quantitatively determine the severity of the
deformity. The evaluation is performed by obtaining a
chest computed tomography scan through the depth of the
deformity. Measurements are made between the sternum and
the vertebral column and transversely across the chest.
The pectus index is determined by dividing the transverse
dimension of the chest by the sterno-vertebral dimension.
Normally, the transverse dimension exceeds the
sterno-vertebral dimension by 2.56 times. The pectus
index was first used at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Only
patients with an index >3.25 underwent surgery (6).
Since then, a pectus index >3.25 has become the
standard indication for surgery.
Echocardiography is beneficial in
detecting cardiac compression and its consequences. There
may be indentation of the right ventricle and mitral
valve prolapse. Compression of the heart is greater in
the upright position than in the supine position.
Compression of the heart by the depressed sternum reduces
stroke volume and cardiac output. Stroke volume decreases
by 40% in the upright position in some patients with
pectus, compared with no change in normal controls (7).
With exercise, stroke volume increases less than in
normal controls and remains fixed with increased work
load, requiring an increase in heart rate to meet blood
flow demands. Morphologic changes in the heart have also
been demonstrated in patients with pectus excavatum. The
right ventricular outflow tract is narrower, and
end-diastolic and end-systolic areas are larger than
normal controls. Right ventricular emptying is reduced
compared with normal controls (8). After pectus repair,
the cardiac index in the upright position has been
reported to increase by up to 38% (79). In
addition, the patients exercise tolerance improves,
and the mitral valve prolapse disappears.
In cases of mild pectus deformity,
pulmonary function is normal; however, a decrease in
pulmonary function occurs in moderate-to-severe pectus
excavatum. Pulmonary function studies demonstrate
obstructive and restrictive defects (10). In preoperative
and postoperative xenon perfusion and ventilation
scintigraphy studies of patients with moderately severe
pectus deformities, two thirds of the patients had
abnormal ventilation before surgery, and >50% showed
improvement after surgery (11). Compression of the left
lung by the displaced heart was consistently observed in
patients with moderate-to-severe pectus deformities.
Abnormal radionuclide retention was greater in the left
lung than the right lung. The standard operation in which
cartilage was removed improved severe, restrictive
pulmonary function; however, there was only slight or no
improvement in pulmonary function in cases of moderate
pectus excavatum (12, 13). Patients with a mild decrease
in pulmonary function (i.e., >75% of normal) have been
reported to have reduced pulmonary function after
costochondrectomy (14). The loss of chest elasticity
because of costal cartilage removal was detrimental to
pulmonary function except in patients with severe
pulmonary dysfunction (7, 1214).
CONCLUSION
The standard costochondrectomy and
sternal osteotomy described by Ravitch in 1949 provide
effective anatomic correction of pectus excavatum (2).
Satisfactory subjective results are achieved in 85% to
95% of patients who have the operation. Cardiac
compression is relieved by the Ravitch procedure, but
improvement in pulmonary function is unlikely in children
with moderate deformities. This is due to the previously
unappreciated decrease in chest elasticity and chest wall
growth when the cartilages are removed (15, 16). When
cartilage removal is too extensive or is performed too
early in childhood, the results may be thoracic dystrophy
and cor pulmonale (17, 18).
Currently, the ease of the Nuss
technique makes it the procedure of choice for surgical
repair of pectus excavatum. However, its long-term
benefits may be greater. Because costal cartilages are
not removed, the Nuss procedure has the potential to
improve not only cardiac function, but pulmonary function
as well by maintaining chest elasticity and chest wall
growth. Noninvasive preoperative and postoperative
studies correlating the severity of the pectus defect
with cardiac and pulmonary functions will help further
define the full value of this major innovation in the
treatment of pectus excavatum.
Acknowledgment
The author is indebted to Jeaney Savickis, RN, for the
intraoperative photography and for her counseling and
care of the patients.
| References |
| 1. |
Nuss D, Kelly RE Jr,
Croitoru DP, Katz ME: A 10-year review of a
minimally invasive technique for the correction
of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg
1998;33:545552. |
| 2. |
Ravitch MN: The operative
treatment of pectus excavatum. Ann Surg
1949;129:429444. |
| 3. |
Adkins PC, Blades B: A
stainless strut for correction of pectus
excavatum. Surg Gynecol Obstet
1961;113:111113. |
| 4. |
Wynn SR, Driscoll DJ,
Ostrom NK, Staats BA, OConnell EJ, Mottram
CD, Telander RL: Exercise cardiorespiratory
function in adolescents with pectus excavatum:
observations before and after operation. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:4147. |
| 5. |
Shamberger RC, Welch KJ:
Cardiopulmonary function in pectus excavatum. Surg
Gynecol Obstet 1988;166:383391. |
| 6. |
Haller JA Jr, Kramer SS,
Lietman SA: Use of CT scan in selection of
patients for pectus excavatum surgery: a
preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg
1987;22:904906. |
| 7. |
Beiser GD, Epstein SE,
Stampfer M, Goldstein RE, Noland SP, Levitsky S:
Impairment of cardiac function in patients with
pectus excavatum, with improvement after
operative correction. N Engl J Med
1972;287:267272. |
| 8. |
Mocchegiani R, Badano L,
Lestuzzi C, Nicolosi GL, Zanuttini D: Relation of
right ventricular morphology and function in
pectus excavatum to the severity of the chest
wall deformity. Am J Cardiol
1995;76:941946. |
| 9. |
Kowalewski J, Barcikowski
S, Brocki M: Cardiorespiratory function before
and after operation for pectus excavatum:
medium-term results. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg
1998;13:275279. |
| 10. |
Cahill JL, Lees GM,
Robertson HT: A summary of preoperative and
postoperative cardiorespiratory performance in
patients undergoing pectus excavatum and
carinatum repair. J Pediatr Surg
1984;19:430433. |
| 11. |
Blickman JG, Rosen PR,
Welch KJ, Papanicolaou N, Treves ST: Pectus
excavatum in children: pulmonary scintigraphy
before and after corrective surgery. Radiology
1985;156:781782. |
| 12. |
Morshtus W, Folgering H,
Barentsz J, van Lier H, Lacquet L: Pulmonary
function before surgery for pectus excavatum and
at long-term follow-up. Chest
1994;105:16461652. |
| 13. |
3. Quigley PM, Haller JA
Jr, Jelus KL, Loughlin GM, Marcus CL:
Cardiorespiratory function before and after
corrective surgery in pectus excavatum. J
Pediatr 1996;128:638643. |
| 14. |
Derveaux L, Clarysse I,
Ivanoff I, Demedts M: Preoperative and
postoperative abnormalities in chest x-ray
indices and in lung function in pectus
deformities. Chest 1989;95:850856. |
| 15. |
Bax MA, Ottenschot T, Gil
D, Vasmeer H: Does early subperichondral removal
of several costal cartilages interfere with chest
wall growth? Pediatr Surg Int 1990;5:165169. |
| 16. |
Martinez D, Juanne J,
Stein T, Pena A: The effect of costal cartilage
resection on chest wall development. Pediatr
Surg Int 1990;5:170173. |
| 17. |
Haller JA Jr, Colombani
PM, Humphries CT, Azizkhan RG, Loughlin GM: Chest
wall constriction after too extensive and too
early operations for pectus excavatum. Ann
Thorac Surg 1996;61:16181624. |
| 18. |
Weber TR, Kurkchubasche
AG: Operative management of asphyxiating thoracic
dystrophy after pectus repair. J Pediatr Surg
1998;33:262265. |
| |