| A rapidly accumulating
body of evidence in preclinical studies has
demonstrated the critical importance of antigen
presentation to effector elements (T cells and B
cells) in the control of the immune response. The
professional antigen-presenting cell is the
dendritic cell. Autologous dendritic cells
obtained from monocytes by culturing can be
loaded with tumor-associated or specific peptides
or other antigens. These antigen-loaded dendritic
cells, when reinjected into experimental animals,
resulted in the generation of activated T cells
that selectively destroyed malignant cells in
vivo, resulting in cures. Human dendritic cells
may enable the development of a powerful means of
inducing an immune response against cancer.
Dendritic cells derived from CD34+ hematopoietic
progenitor cells may be more effective than
dendritic cells from monocytes. We are now able
to generate large numbers of dendritic cells in
vivo and ex vivo, thus enabling the design and
implementation of clinical trials in the
treatment of cancer using these cells.
As the
biology of dendritic cells continues to unfold,
it is clear that specific dendritic cell subtypes
are more effective than others in the generation
of cytotoxic T cells against a neoplastic cell.
Other dendritic cell subtypes are responsible, in
part, for the induction of immune tolerance. Work
at the Baylor Institute for Immunology Research
has resulted in a new treatment for melanoma
using dendritic cell vaccinations. Similar
treatment strategies are planned for breast
cancer, prostate cancer, and hematologic
malignancies.
|
he human immune system, comprising
antibodies and effector cells, provides a powerful means
of destroying invading infectious agents and cancer
cells. To selectively destroy neoplastic disease in
humans using the immune system has been the goal of
clinical scientists for decades. Such an effort takes
advantage of antigenic differences that neoplastic cells
possess as compared with normal tissue and then targets
these differences with a specific cytotoxic agent using
monoclonal antibodies or activated T lymphocytes (T
cells) or natural killer cells. In many instances,
monoclonal antibodies specific to cancer cell antigens
can be manufactured and biochemically coupled with a
cellular toxin (e.g., ricin or a radioactive isotope) (1). Successful treatment
results in selective cancer cell death. Depending on the
cancer cell antigen, certain monoclonal antibodies result
in a T-cell attack on target cells. Antibody therapy for
cancer has shown great promise but has significant
limitations. These include the nonspecific toxicity
(e.g., capillary leaking syndrome) associated with many
immunotoxins, the poor penetration of the tumor by
monoclonal antibodies, and the complexity of the
synthesis of immunotoxins (2). The manufacture of
monoclonal antibodies to specific cancer antigens demands
discovery and characterization of these antigens. This
has proved difficult.
Cellular therapy of cancer
requires generation of effective numbers of T cells or
natural killer cells (effector cells) against
tumor-specific antigens. Several strategies have been
explored in the clinic: 1) administration of cytokines
that nonselectively expand T cells or natural killer
cells in vivo, resulting in the cloning of cells that
destroy cancer cells; 2) transfection of a cytokine gene
into cancer cells, resulting in the development of tumor
immunogenicity in the host; and 3) vaccination of the
patient using tumor-specific or associated peptides or
proteins (3-5). These approaches to cellular
therapy for cancer have been effective but, like antibody
therapy, are associated with significant limitations.
Some of these limitations are toxicity to the host
associated with in vivo cytokine administration; poor
gene expression in the tumor cell, resulting in an
ineffective immune response; and lack of an immune
response after vaccination with tumor-specific peptides
or proteins.
The fundamental problem in
inducing an immune response to a tumor in vivo may be
that the demands in initiating effective T-cell immunity
are too high, or there may be an overpowering suppression
of T-cell immunity by the tumor itself. Recently,
dendritic cells (DC) have been recognized as the
initiators and the modulators of the immune response.
Dendritic cells are effective educators of B and T
lymphocytes. Unlike B cells that can activate by antigen
complexing with their cell surface receptors, T cells
need antigen to be processed and presented to them by
antigen-presenting cells (6). The DC is the
professional antigen-presenting cell and possesses a
unique ability to activate a powerful immune response in
vivo (7). Therefore, while great strides
have been made in understanding the role of T cells,
natural killer cells, or antibodies in mediating
antitumor immunity, clearly, these elements represent the
end stage of an immune response. It is likely that the
effect of T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells
against a cancer cell is determined initially by DC.
Dendritic cells
are found in all tissues and in the blood in extremely
small numbers (less than 0.1% of circulating leukocytes).
However, they are identifiable by immunophenotyping using
sensitive multicolor flow cytometry and functionally with
in vitro culture systems. Dendritic cells are
heterogenous, and distinct subtypes can be identified by
multicolor flow cytometry. They are recognized in tissues
(so-called interstitial DC) and in the liver, kidney,
heart, pancreas, gut, dermis and epidermis (Langerhans?
cells), thymus, T cell?rich areas of lymph nodes
(interdigitating DC), and blood. Dendritic cells can
vigorously internalize solutes by micropinocytosis, thus
permitting the delivery of soluble antigens into major
histocompatibility class (MHC), class II?rich vesicles.
Dendritic cells, in addition, are
effective in presenting antigen by other methods,
including ingestion of apoptotic bodies derived from
tumor cells. Ex vivo incubation of DC with tumor lysates
or transfection of genes encoding for tumor-associated
antigen results in the generation of DC that activate T
cells. Dendritic cells express high levels of
antigen-presenting molecules (MHC class I and II and CD1)
and so-called ?accessory? molecules, thus enabling
initialization and amplification of a specific immune
response to target antigens (7). Mature DC possess high
expression of the CD28, CD80, and CD86 molecules,
enabling efficient development of a cytotoxic T-cell
response. CD40, in addition, is expressed in high density
on DC, and its triggering results in up-regulation of
accessory molecules and the production of cytokines
including interleukin (IL)-12 (8). Interleukin-12
enhances the maturation of T cells toward the Th1 pathway
and activates natural killer cells. The Th1 pathway
mediates cellular toxicity against cancer cells or
infectious pathogens.
The role of DC
is to act as sentinels of invading infectious agents or
tissue injury (like the inflammation caused by cancer
cell growth). When this occurs, DC, because of their
motility and cell membrane biology, have the remarkable
capability of capturing and processing antigens and
migrating to secondary lymphoid organs to interact with T
cells and facilitate T-cell activation against the target
antigen. Dendritic cells are efficient; 1 DC can activate
100 to 3000 T cells.
Monocyte-derived DC vaccination
experiments in animals prevented the growth of
transplanted cancer cells and resulted in cures in
animals with established tumors (9). Remarkably,
immunization with DC that were pulsed with poorly
immunogenetic tumors resulted in major responses (some
cures), even with the use of whole tumor antigens (e.g.,
tumor lysates). Dendritic cells pulsed with whole tumor
antigen may enable antigen presentation by both MHC class
I and class II pathways, in contrast to the use of
specific tumor peptides that solely rely on MHC class I
presentation.
Recently it has become possible to
harvest large numbers of human DC, enabling the design
and implementation of vaccination Recently it has become
possible to harvest large therapy for cancer patients.
Human blood monocytes cultured in vitro with IL-4 and
granulocyte-macrophage colony?stimulating factor
(GM-CSF) result in large numbers of functional DC. These
monocyte-derived DC have been loaded in vitro with
melanoma antigens and, when vaccinated into patients with
metastatic melanoma, resulted in significant measurable
regressions of disease. Some patients experienced a
complete remission (10). These antigen-loaded DC
resulted in the generation of significant numbers of
activated T cells that were toxic to melanoma cells in
vitro. Further, monocyte-derived DC have been used in a
similar fashion in the successful treatment of selected
patients with non-Hodgkin?s lymphoma (11). In all of these
preliminary clinical trials, antigen-loaded DC
vaccinations were well tolerated and were associated with
no significant side effects. Most patients in these
trials developed in vitro antitumor cellular responses.
Evidence shows that antigen-loaded
DC derived from the culture of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells
with cytokines may result in more efficient DC activation
of T cells when compared with monocyte-derived DC (12). CD34+ cells can be collected
from patients and cultured in vitro with Flt-3-ligand,
GM-CSF, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), resulting in
significant numbers of DC (Palucka K, Banchereau J,
Curiel T, Fay J, unpublished observations). Dendritic
cells manufactured from CD34+ cells undergo several defined
steps in cell maturation, resulting in the ability to
culture DC subtypes. It is possible to study various DC
subtypes when the starting cell in culture is the CD34+ progenitor cell. Such
flexibility may enhance the design of effective trials
using DC in the treatment of cancer patients.
Investigators at Baylor University Medical Center are
planning the first study of DC derived from CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor
cells in the treatment of patients who have metastatic
melanoma.
Most neoplastic
diseases, including breast cancer, prostate cancer, and
hematologic malignancies, may be treated effectively with
DC-based vaccination therapy. The initial studies will
involve patients with relatively advanced cancer in order
to determine the safety and tolerability of
tumor-specific DC vaccination therapy. Subsequently,
however, when safety and tolerability have been proved,
DC vaccinations may prove effective in the prevention of
recurrent cancer after an initial remission has been
accomplished with surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy.
There are reasons why DC
vaccinations may prove ineffective in the treatment of
cancer, and these hurdles must be addressed. Cancer
cells, for example, often possess molecules that
inactivate attacking T cells (e.g., Fas ligand) or
prevent DC maturation (e.g., vascular endothelial growth
factor or IL-10) (13, 14). In addition, patients
whose T-cell repertoire has been depleted or suppressed
by previous cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy
may not have sufficient T cells for the generation of
cytotoxic T cells against tumor cells (15). Alternatively,
however, DC given to such patients may enhance the T-cell
repertoire.
Clinical scientists at Baylor
University Medical Center have been involved with studies
using Flt-3-ligand, a cytokine that induces DC generation
in vivo (16). Clinical trials at
Baylor using Flt-3-ligand in the treatment of lymphoma
are under way. In addition, studies are under way with
normal volunteer subjects who receive Flt-3-ligand to
determine the most effective way to generate DC for
clinical use and, at the same time, to examine the effect
of Flt-3-ligand on the immune response to commonly used
peptide vaccinations.
In conclusion,
studies of human DC and their use in the vaccination of
patients against their own neoplastic disease are under
way at Baylor University Medical Center. This new
approach has great promise in the treatment of cancer.
Acknowledgment
Supported in
part by a grant from Cancer Research Institute, 681 Fifth
Avenue, New York, New York 10022.
| References |
| 1 |
Vitetta ES, Stone MJ,
Amlot P, Fay JW, May R, Til M, Newman J, Clark P,
Collins RH, Cunningham D, Ghetie V, Uhr JW,
Thorpe P: A phase I immunotoxin trial in patients
with B-cell lymphoma. Can Res 1991;51:4052-4058.
back |
| 2 |
Uhr JW, Scheuremman RH,
Street NE, Vitetta E: Cancer dormancy:
opportunities for new therapeutic approaches. Nat
Med 1997;3:505-509. back |
| 3 |
Philip PA, Flaherty L:
Treatment of malignant melanoma with
interleukin-2. Semin Oncol 1997;24(1 Suppl
4):S32-S38. back |
| 4 |
Gilboa E: Immunotherapy of
cancer with genetically modified tumor vaccines.
Semin Oncol 1996;23:101-107. back |
| 5 |
Rosenberg SA, Yang JC,
Schwartzentruber DJ, Hwu P, Marincola FM,
Topalian SL, Restifo NM, Dudley ME, Schwarz SL,
Spiess PJ, Wunderlich JR, Parkurst MR, Kawakami
Y, Seipp CA, Einhorn JH, White DE: Immunologic
and therapeutic evaluation of synthetic peptide
vaccine for the treatment of patients with
metastatic melanoma. Nat Med
1998;4:321-327. back |
| 6 |
Banchereau J, Steinman RM:
Dendritic cells in the control of immunity. Nature
1998;392:245-252. back |
| 7 |
Caux C, Vanbervliet B,
Massacrier C, Dezutter-Dambuant C, de Saint-Vis
B, Jacquet C, Yoneda K, Imamura S, Schmitt D,
Banchereau J: CD34+ hematopoietic
progenitors from human cord blood differentiate
along two independent dendritic cell pathways in
response to GM-CSF + TNF alpha. J Exp Med
1996;184:695-706. back |
| 8 |
Ridge JP, Di Rosa F,
Matzinger P: A conditioned dendritic cell can be
a temporal bridge between a CD4+ T-helper and a
T-killer cell. Nat Med 1998;393:474-477. back |
| 9 |
Mayordomo JI, Zorina T,
Storkus WJ, Zitvogel L, Celluzzi C, Falo LD,
Melief CJ, Ilstad ST, Kast WM, Deleo AB, Lotze
MT: Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells pulsed
with synthetic tumor peptides elicit protective
and therapeutic anti-tumor immunity. Nat Med
1995;12:1297-1302. back |
| 10 |
Nestle FO, Alijagic S,
Gilliet M, Sun Y, Grabbe S, Dummer R, Burg G,
Schadendorf S: Vaccination of melanoma patients
with peptide- or tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic
cells. Nat Med 1998;3:328-332. back |
| 11 |
Hsu FJ, Benike C, Fagnoni
F, Liles TM, Czervinski D, Taidi B, Engleman EJ,
Levy R: Vaccination of patients with B-cell
lymphoma using autologous antigen-pulsed
dendritic cells. Nat Med 1996;2:52-58. back |
| 12 |
Mortarini R, Anichini A,
Di Nicola M, Siena S, Bregni M, Belli F, Molla A,
Gianni AM, Parmiani G: Autologous dendritic cells
derived from CD34+ progenitors and
from monocytes are not functionally equivalent
antigen-presenting cells in the induction of
melan-A/Mart-1 and 27-35 -specific CTLs
from peripheral blood lymphocytes of melanoma
patients with low-frequency of CTL precursors. Cancer
Res 1997;57:5534-5541. back |
| 13 |
Griffith TS, Brunner T,
Fletcher SM, Green DR, Ferguson TA: Fas
ligand-induced apoptosis as a mechanism of immune
privilege. Science 1995;270: 1189-1192. back |
| 14 |
Gabrilovich DI, Chen HL,
Girgis KR, Cunningham HT, Meny GM, Nadif S,
Kavanaugh D, Carbone DP: Production of vascular
endothelial growth factor by human tumors
inhibits the functional maturation of dendritic
cells. Nat Med 1996;2:1096-1103. back |
| 15 |
Sprent J, Tough DF, Sun S:
Factors controlling the turnover of T memory
cells. Immunol Rev 1997;156:79-85. back |
| 16 |
Lynch DH, Andreasen A,
Maraskovsky E, Whitmore J, Miller RE, Schuh JCL:
Flt3 ligand induces tumor regression and
antitumor immune responses in vivo. Nat Med
1997;6:625-631. back |
| |