| Contrast
angiography is an integral part of cardiovascular disease
diagnosis. In 1994, US cardiologists performed >1.8
million diagnostic angiographic procedures (1). Radiologists
and vascular surgeons also perform these procedures in
many hospitals.
The
delivery of contrast material can be done either manually
with a syringe or mechanically with a power injector.
Traditionally, hand-injected techniques using 10-mL
syringes have been limited by a lack of adequate power
and volume. Limitations in power and volume have resulted
in suboptimal imaging during the following
procedures:
- diagnostic
coronary angiography using 5F and 6F catheters,
particularly in patients with high coronary
resistance or flows (e.g., patients with
hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy,
aortic regurgitation);
- angiography
of the iliac and femoral vessels;
- aortography;
- ventriculography;
- percutaneous
transluminal coronary angiography using 6F or 7F
guiding catheters; and
- coronary
interventions using bulky devices (e.g.,
rotational atherectomy with large burrs,
directional atherectomy, excimer laser
angioplasty, and others).
Larger
syringes require power in excess of manual capabilities.
Therefore, when larger volumes or greater power is
needed, a mechanical power injector is used. The use of a
mechanical power injector, while essential in many
settings, is sometimes cumbersome and impractical. For
instance, an assistant is needed to set up the nonsterile
device on a sterile field. Once connected to the
catheter, hemodynamic monitoring is temporarily
suspended. Some wastage of contrast material is
inevitable, and reloading (should additional injections
become necessary) is inconvenient. Most notable, however,
is the lack of physician control over contrast material
delivery once the injection sequence has begun.
Mechanical power injectors have
been used in place of manual 10-mL syringes during
routine coronary angiography as well as during coronary
angioplasty when imaging is hampered by interventional
devices within the guide catheter (2, 3). This, however,
still does not eliminate the problems of sterility, the
need for an assistant, and the lack of control once the
injection has been activated. A modified hand injector
used for coronary visualization during angioplasty was
developed by Weiner et al (4), but the device
was limited by a small (4 mL) maximal capacity for
a given injection, and the device was not further
developed.
A new
hand-operated, mechanically advantaged, disposable
syringe (OZ Power Syringe, Cardiovascular Innovations,
Athens, Tex.) (Figure 1) has been
developed. This patented and Food and Drug
Administration?approved device offers an additional tool
to perform various angiographic procedures (Figures
2-4). These procedures include
diagnostic coronary angiography using 5F and 6F catheter
systems. Coronary interventions using small (6F) guide
catheters is becoming popular (both by radial and femoral
approaches), and more coronary interventions using bulky
devices (e.g., directional coronary atherectomy,
high-speed rotational atherectomy) are being performed.
The OZ Power Syringe becomes useful in all of these
situations by providing a greater degree of power for
injection. Its other main applications, such as
peripheral vascular imaging and interventions,
aortography (especially infrarenal aortography), and
ventriculography, use its ability to deliver larger
volumes of contrast at greater pressures than possible
with the manual syringe. The OZ Power Syringe is
useful in other procedures, such as intraoperative
vascular imaging, saline delivery during excimer laser
coronary angioplasty, and inflation of valvuloplasty
balloons.
This
sterile, disposable power syringe provides physicians
with total control of angiography while enhancing their
manual power several fold. The use of a lever system to
drive the plunger into the syringe barrel, along with the
ability to use the entire palm to grip the handle,
enables the operator to generate much greater degrees of
pressure. Physicians can control the exact delivery of
contrast, 1 to 32 mL, while visualizing the image
fluoroscopically. Excellent quality images can be
obtained using a reduced volume of contrast material.
Additionally, by diluting the contrast with saline (25%
to 50%), the operator can further reduce the quantity of
contrast material while reducing the patient's heat and
pain sensations.
During
interventional cardiac procedures, the extra power
provided allows the use of smaller-sized catheters for
the radial or femoral arterial approaches (Figure
5). The smaller catheters and
reduced quantity of contrast material improve patient
comfort, allow for early ambulation, reduce renal
toxicity, and decrease cost.
In the
surgical suite, the mechanical power injector is limited
in use, cumbersome, and nonsterile. The new power syringe
provides improved imaging capabilities for large-vessel
angiography and greatly enhances the visualization
necessary for the new procedure of stent-graft placement
(Figure 6).
Thus, the power syringe is a
complementary tool for the cardiovascular physician to
enhance imaging capabilities and improve patient
outcomes. Prospective studies are being designed to
compare this device with previously available injectors.
Note: Dr. Anwar is a
major stockholder in Cardiovascular Innovations, the
manufacturer of the OZ Power Syringe.Ed
| References |
| 1 |
Graves
EJ, Gillum BS: 1994 Summary: National Hospital
Discharge Survey. Advance data from vital and
health statistics, no. 278. Hyattsville, Md.:
National Center for Health Statistics, 1996. back |
| 2 |
Angelini
P: Use of mechanical injectors during
percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
(PTCA). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn
1989;16:193-194. back |
| 3 |
Goss
JE, Ramo BW, Raff GL, Maddoux GL, Heuser RR,
Shadoff N, Leatherman GF: Power injection of
contrast media during percutaneous transluminal
coronary artery angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc
Diagn 1989;16:195-198. back |
| 4 |
Weiner
RI, Maranhao V: A modified hand injector for
percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1987;13:145-147. back |
| |